|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscribe to Bloggers speak out on BradReese.Com Cisco's San Jose office made pornographic phone call to traumatize Brad Reese "It appears that Brad's cell phone # was dialed from Cisco's San Jose campus --- but not from a person's desk, instead from a meeting room (where the outgoing number displays the main switchboard number). Two 'senior directors' inside Cisco's Corporate Development team (according to meeting room booking logs) who initiated phone calls of an inappropriate nature to Brad Reese's cell phone."
Hummelstown, PA: Thu, 3/6/14 - 11:33pm View comments
Update: 3/4/2015
Corporate Renegade names names!
Update: 3/21/2014 - 4:17pm
After a 1-week investigation, Cisco was unable to determine if its San Jose corporate headquarters office phones had been used improperly.
Update: 3/7/2014 - 3:41pm
I'm sorry to hear you received such a disturbing call. If the call was made by a Cisco employee, then it would certainly not meet our general standards for polite behavior, let alone the professional standards our Code of Business Conduct call for from our employees.
If you are seeking a constructive way to address this, I'd recommend making a formal complaint to the Cisco ethics line.
Best regards,
David McCulloch
Last week Cisco's San Jose office decided to make me the target of a Cisco telephone harassment campaign:
After receiving this 1st Cisco phone call, I made a comment to a blog post acknowledging that I had received a mischievous telephone call from Cisco.
I have to admit that I was in total shock and stunned beyond belief that Cisco would do such a thing. I mean, it was so inconceivable to me that all I could think of as a response was to laugh as loud as possible into the phone.
Eventually after what seemed like an eternity at the time, Cisco ended the call.
I concluded that there's no way Cisco would make such a pornographic phone call, so I believed that an individual must be "spoofing" Cisco's main corporate headquarters phone number, 408-526-4000, in order to intimidate me.
Since I never mentioned receiving that 2nd phone call from Cisco, imagine my surprise this evening when the following comment was made to a blog post:
I made some inquiries about this, and rest assured, I can now conclusively assert that there is no clandestine or any formal action into our good pal Brad Reese.
Although, I was informed that there has been a series of prank calls of a juvenile nature (involving silly pornographic voice mails) made from meeting rooms at Cisco's San Jose campus, according to its internal records.
My source is a very senior attorney inside Cisco's Legal Dept. This source is extremely reliable and credible, given that 99.9% of the stuff this individual has coveyed to me were proven to be true and factual.
According to the source, any and all actions initiated by 'corporate investigations' has to be rubber-stamped by an internal security team that legal oversees. There is absolutely nothing on-going or impending on Brad Reese. The source also has limited access to call records (mainly for compliance for securities and corporate legal purposes). Cisco Legal and PR has ben in contact with Brad on previous occasions but not in relation to this story. It appears that Brad's cell phone # was dialed from Cisco's San Jose campus --- but not from a person's desk, instead from a meeting room (where the outgoing number displays the main switchboard number).
The source further states one one particular occasion two 'senior directors' inside Cisco's Corporate Development team (according to meeting room booking logs) who initiated phone calls of an inappropriate nature to Brad Reese's cell phone. It is unclear whether a voice mail was left or if Brad was a party to these childish display of conduct by Cisco employees.
I would be happy to share the particulars of the alleged individual partly responsible for the alleged calls but that could also divulge the identity of my source. I am not sure if Brad would initiate a formal complaint to Cisco (especially now that Mike Quinn is gone and not sure who will make it a 'hobby' to address these), still, if these allegations are true, then it not only violates Cisco's internal employee code of conduct (e.g. harassment, inappropriate behaviour, viewing inappropriate adult content within Cisco's offices, etc), it demonstrates as to what kinda people actually 'work' there (and I use the term 'work' rather broadly).
Therefore, confirmed. It was a prank call, although it is unclear whether it was one phone call or a series of calls (the sources suggests it was two).
I know Corporate Renegade has indeed confirmed the calls came directly from Cisco because his comment contains "precise details" that I had not disclosed to anyone.
Related document:
Subscribe to Bloggers speak out on BradReese.Com
|
| |||||
©2015 Alliance Networking LLC - Home - About - Repair - Power Supplies - Refurbished - Blog - Quick Links - Site Map - Contact Us |